You can rest assured that, working with this VIRTUAL Institute for Chromatography, you will enjoy the latest developments globally. The exclusive speciality is “finding and reducing systematic analytical errors in chromatography”. We know of the sensitivity very many chromatographers have about this topic as they fear too much unnecessarily. They will quickly get in agreement with users of their analytical results in the moment the users understand the problem quantitatively and not only based on costs of reputation and money: all decisions based on data are only as correct and complete as the data they got. Those users may even understand what is the fundamental condition for correct data:
* testing - testing - testing (costs time and money)
* calibration with cleanest substances (is hard work)
* repetition of measurements at the optimum of effort over risk -
which is N = 4 (N = 2 is standard but much too bad in costs over risk)
* the smallest repetition number N=1 is useless, no standard deviation value is possible
For the N=1 statement (useless as mentioned above) see however µ-PLC
just because the costs of qualified analytical work are incomparably lower than the costs caused by errors. (Have a look into the page “Errors in Chromatography” and into “Statistics“ in this site) even if you as chemist dislike “statistics”. We used the easiest way of providing the smallest necessary background.
The author knows very well what stands behind these statements: A very small repeatability standard deviation may pay back millions of dollars per day in case of mass production in the pharmaceutical and energy industry.
Critical analytical data which are as correct as technically possible may avoid after-costs of millions in case of health and environmental trouble caused by qualitative and quantitative analytical errors. Analysts work for third parties. They carry a huge responsibility. They should have the best tools and optimal conditions to do their duties correct. Bad analytical data are comparable to wrong medical diagnosis. At least the latter is understood by those who may not understand analysis which produces numbers, words, graphics and costs but nothing to fill containers.
To the two pictures above:
“To Detect and Reduce Systematic Analytical Errors”.
The left figure documents avoidable or repairable HPTLC sampling errors which cost the analyst a factor of up to ten in precision and accuracy for analytical data. Such sampling error is “standard” especially when direct coupling HPLC with HPTLC. It MUST be corrected by focussing the sample lines from differing HPLC peaks - see for instance µ-PLC , a new analytical mode of modern instrumental thin-layer chromatography, supporting gas- and column liquid chromatography as well as offering the utmost of data safety when comparing two products, which theoretically should be equal but practically differ. Quite important in the field of medical products quality control.
The first Internet-only-book by this author concentrates on the latest PLC development µ-PLC and is now available under www.planar-chromatography-by-kaiser.com . This book got three consecutive papers (ppt/pdf-files) telling the stepwise development of micro-planar-chromatography.
Just click on ‘ HERE ‘ to load the book. The ppt/pdf papers need FIREFOX version 3.5 or SAFARI version 4.0 or higher or the Microsoft browser IE7 or later and ADOBE READER 910 or later. The site itself loads quick but the papers need a minute or more to become readable using the right / left arrow. The last paper has been given at the BALATON 2009 symposium
See also the page “µ-PLC” on this SITE.
The nice looking right figure above should remind the “HPLC only” user, that it would be an error, not to know about the analytical power of to days accuracy, precision and versatility of modern instrumentalized planar chromatography with tens of stationary phases, hundreds of mobile phases and far more than hundred often highly sensitive, highly selective and easy to use detectors inmcluding MS. The only new problem may be: the additional use of this modern analytical technique in HPLC research chromatography may cause quite some trouble. It may drastically change analytical results. The HPLC-ones may be in full disagreement with the data found prior the easily done marriage of HPLC with HPTLC The figure right has been given to IfC by CAMAG, Switzerland, the global Number One in Modern HPTLC. See www.camag.com .
There may be another fundamental problem: Using the new µ-PLC technique The HPLC peak can be checked for ist purity. If this is not 100 % (mole %, or weight-%) the main HPLC peak is a substance mixture, This will surely result in a most critical situation: the qualitative identification may be systematically false (spectra of differing substances may be accurately equal) and surely the quantitative results will be systematically wrong. As the full HPLC-peak eluate can be transferred quantitatively onto the circular µ-PLC plate, made free from the HPLC-mobile phase, focussed into a sharp circle line and now reseparated using totally differing phase pairs mobile and stationary - to end this long sentence and story: as a result a new MS identification now based on the separated parts of this formerly 100 % clean HPLC peak may change all the decision made up to now ....
Well: at many examples of similar analytical desaster stories the authors proposal was: do NOT combine analytical chromatography methods of strongly differing modes and phases, if you have a weak heart.
But if you feel your analytical power: do it. It helps everybody and goes positive of course - even the board of directors may finally agree with you as finally the correct data pay back.
NOTE: in this site there are proposals which look like out of date as the instruments, materials and concepts on the market are tuned exclusively for the future of GCxGC and LCxLC already discussed at the second “Hindelang” Capillary Chromatography symposium in the last century.
To days practical chromatography however is still far - very far - away from its limits and there is still no theoretical concept accepted which fits to the total of chromatography ranges.
The author of this site uses intensively the power of chromatography combination i.e. GC with GC, HPLC with HPTLC and µ-PLC. All three techniques are of equal capacity in supporting each other. In fact the co-action of these three is analytically unbeatable.